A Simple Migration/Invasion Workflow Using an Automated Live-cell Imager | Protocol

Feb, 2nd 2019, 21:00 by



Cell migration and invasion are important biological processes that enable normal functions in the human body, such as wound closure, invasion of placenta into the uterus and mammary gland morphogenesis1,2,3. The human body has precise and strict control of these biological events; however, there are some exceptions. Malignant tumors, for example, are able to escape this safeguard, exhibit abnormal proliferation and invade into neighboring tissue, which is called metastasis. Metastasis is the major cause of cancer-related mortality4.
Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women, and is the second-highest cause of cancer-related death among women in developed countries worldwide5. Breast cancer originates from ducts or lobules that consist of one or more layers of epithelial cells. In the normal breast, epithelial cells adhere to one another and to the basement membrane through membrane proteins such as E-cadherin and integrins6. However, invasive breast cancer cells have lost their polarity and cell-cell adhesion, and classically undergo epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) and gain the ability to move. After extravasation, these cells move across the extracellular matrix (ECM) and enter the blood vessel or the lymphatic system, followed then by intravasation and metastatic growth7. Understanding the mechanisms by which this occurs is of great significance, since metastasis is the most common cause of cancer-related mortalities and is closely related to cancer cell migration/invasion. To visualize the movement of cancer cells, migration and invasion assays are ideal models to study 2D and 3D cell movement, respectively. Migration directly assesses the movement of the cells whereas invasion involves interaction with the microenvironment and the ability to degrade biological barriers. The two processes are not fully independent of one another, as migration is a requirement of invasion.
Several methods have been developed to study migration and invasion. As reviewed by Kramer et al., migration assays such as wound healing, fence and micro-carrier assays generate a cell-free area to allow cells to move into, assessing the change of area; whereas, transwell and capillary assays are based on the number of cells that move toward an attractant8. For invasion assays, an ECM environment has to be set up with ECM gel or collagen for instance, and 3D movement can be assessed by monitoring the invasion area, distance and cell counts (e.g. transwell assay, platypus assay)8. Another type of invasion assay is to combine the invasive cells with non-invasive cells and assess the behavior of the invasive cells (e.g. spheroid assays). The above methods have their pros and cons, and a way that is easy to approach, easy to repeat, and to combine the migration assay and invasion assay in a similar workflow is preferential in experimental design.
This protocol describes the measurement of cell migration and invasion using a live-cell imager. It is a real-time cell monitoring system installed in a standard cell culture incubator. It takes high definition images according to the set scanning intervals and measurements by applying appropriate masks to the cells or fluorescent targets. The module of migration/invasion assay includes using a 96-pin scratch tool, which is suitable for making homogeneous scratch wounds on a cell monolayer in a 96-well plate. The mechanism is based on in vitro wound healing assays, monitoring 2D cell movement on a plastic or coated surface. Invasion or 3D movement across an additional ECM within the scratch wound can also be assessed. A brief workflow is illustrated in Figure 1.
This migration/invasion assay is based on the wound healing assay, which evaluates the rate of the cells moving into a cell-free area created by the 96-pin scratch tool. The difference between the migration and invasion assays are that migration assays measure cells moving on the tissue-culture treated plastic surface and invasion measures cells moving across ECM gel.
The scratch tool is designed to make consistent scratch wounds in the designated plate and the live-cell imager is designed to take real-time high-resolution images with the scratch wounds in the middle. The two breast cancer cell lines used in the current protocol are ZR75-1 and MDA-MB-231, categorized as luminal B and triple negative subtypes respectively9. The scratch wounds generated by the 96-pin scratch tool are commonly between 700-900 µm but may vary among different cell lines (Figure 2).
For the migration assay, three metrics are provided: (1) Wound width (µm) is the average distance between cell sheets beside the wound (Figure 3). (2) Wound confluence (%) is the confluence within the wounding area (Figure 3). The ideal initial wound confluence should be close to 0%. (3) Relative wound density (%) is a background-subtracted algorithm [%Relative wound density = 100 * (w(t) - w(0)) / (c(t) - w(0)), t = at time t, w = density of wound region, c = density of cell region], measuring the density of the wound region relative to the density of the cell region.
Three eligible metrics can be achieved based on the needs. The relative wound density and wound confluence imply the speed of cells occupying the scratch wound area, and they almost overlap in both cell lines. But the two cell lines showed very different wound healing abilities, where at the completion (circa 50 h) of the wound healing process of MDA-MB-231 cells, ZR75-1 cells had about 50% wound coverage (the two metrics above) and over 400 µm remaining wound width, indicating a lower migration ability of the ZR75-1 cells (Figure 4).
The migrating behaviors of the two cell types were different and can be compared based on the recorded images. Lamellipodia (blebbing protrusions) were observed in MDA-MB-231 cells at the migration front at the beginning of migration, which was a typical sign of cytoskeleton rearrangement, directing cell movement toward the cell-free region10 (Figure 5). ZR75-1 cells showed no sign of cell migration at the same time-point (Figure 5).
The metric Relative Wound Density is recommended by the manufacturer for cell invasion, as it is a 3D assay, and confluence-based analysis is not applicable. Within 50 h, the relative wound density of MDA-MB-231 cells was saturated (100%), whereas the relative wound density of ZR75-1 cells did not change over time, indicating the highly invasive phenotype of MDA-MB-231 cells and the non-invasiveness of ZR75-1 cells (Figure 6).
MDA-MB-231 cells also behaved differently while invading through ECM gel (Figure 7). Compared to cells with bleb at the migration front, invading cells showed an elongated morphology with leading protrusions.
Figure 3: Migration assay illustrated by HD phase contrast images and blended mode with masks in MDA-MB-231. Blue, scratch wound; yellow, cells surrounding the scratch wound; pink, cells that moved into the scratch wound at 24 h after scratch. Scale bars = 300 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Comparison of three algorithms (wound width, relative wound density and wound confluence of breast cancer cell lines ZR75-1 (left) and MDA-MB-231 (right). All experiments represent the mean of three independent experiments, ± the S.D. Scale bars = 300 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: Migration front of ZR75-1 and MDA-MB-231 cells 4 h after scratch. Arrows, lamellipodia at the migration front. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 6: Quantification of invasion using metric Relative Wound Density (%) of breast cancer cell line ZR75-1 (left) and MDA-MB-231 (right). All experiments represent the mean of three independent experiments, ± the S.D. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Migration and invasion are important parameters to assess the mobility of cancer cells. By using the 96-pin scratch tool, it is possible to conduct wound healing assays in 2D and 3D simultaneously. Apart from facilitating automatic scanning, providing a stable cell culture environment with minimum disruption, the scratch assay conducted using the 96-pin scratch tool provides consistent scratch wounds, enabling experiments that are more robust and reproducible. The 96-well plate format gives additional options of either increasing the number of cell lines or different drug treatments. In addition, cell morphology changes and dynamic movement can be recorded for further analysis.
The migration/invasion assay is designed to be easily applicable with a few prerequisites. A confluent cell monolayer is critical prior to wounding to ensure a directed cell movement toward the gap. It is therefore highly recommended to optimize cell seeding density, and a timeframe between 6-18 h is typically ideal. The ability of the experimental cells attaching to the surface and the proliferation rate will affect this timeframe. Prolonged incubation time may lead to strong cell-cell adhesion and generate crooked bilateral cell fronts due to removal of cell sheets. A biomatrix coating will be helpful with less adhesive cell lines, to decrease the waiting time. Cells can be starved before wounding. Starvation timing is similar to scratch timing, which is when the confluence reaches nearly 100%, and the starvation media and duration are cell type dependent. Cells can also be transfected, but seeding density has to be determined for a prolonged time before wounding, considering incubation time of the transfection process. Wounding can be achieved within a few seconds using the 96-pin scratch tool. Defined-sized pins guarantee a precise migration/invasion starting line and distance. Importantly, the top and bottom sections must be well-aligned to complete a full scratch across the wells, so that the live-cell images don't include either terminal of the scratch wounds. The scratch wounds can be easily observed through naked eyes on the confluent cell monolayer and can be quickly checked under a bright field microscope. Washing of the wells should be performed immediately and gently to avoid reattachment of dislodged cells and removal of bilateral cells. If one washing is sufficient to clean up the desired cell-free zone, there is no need for an additional wash.
Migration assays can be finalized by adding culture media with or without treatments and are ready to scan, whereas a few additional steps are needed to be taken into account for an invasion assay. Unlike cell migration, invading cells penetrate through ECM, which more closely reflects in vivo cell movement better. The principal of the current protocol is to generate an ECM-surrounded environment by using ECM gel. Cells are seeded on ECM gel-coated wells and after wounding, ECM gel is layered on the cells and the scratch wound. When handling ECM gel, it is better to keep everything cold to avoid gelation. Unevenly distributed ECM gel can cause problems when focusing the microscope. Due to the viscous nature of ECM gel, it is possible to generate bubbles, but the bubbles can be easily removed by aspirating 70% ethanol through a spray bottle. To generate fine but not excessive spray, simply unscrew the cap of the spray bottle and spray off the excess 70% ethanol within the straw pointing elsewhere. By spraying at a distance above and horizontal to the plate, the fine 70% ethanol spray is sufficient to eliminate the bubbles.
The first scan should commence as soon as possible following wounding, to capture the initial cell-free wound area, and this is important for establishing the criteria for the analysis. The scan intervals depend on the cell type, as more invasive cell lines have a more rapid wound closure rate.
This migration/invasion application is relatively straightforward, and by using the built-in analysis module, cell movement can be graphed kinetically with 3 metrics: the wound width, wound confluence and the relative wound density (Figure 3). All three can be used to assess migration. Wound width describes the average distance in µm when the bilateral cell sheets move relatively parallel, and is independent of the initial wound boundary. Wound confluence and relative wound density, on the contrary, require the initial wound boundary in the calculation, and describe the confluence within the wound area and the cell density relative to the unwounded area, respectively. For the invasion assay, relative wound density is recommended, since it computes the wound area in reference to the bilateral cell sheets. Readers can choose the one that best represents their needs.
This scratch wound migration/invasion assay can be convenient, but it requires the 96-pin scratch tool, designated plates, and the live-cell imager with the integrated migration/invasion module to reproduce the typical results presented in this protocol, and these can be expensive. Cost-effective substitutions such as a flat bottom 96-well multiwell plate can be used and can generate decent scratch wounds (data not shown). However, the performance of the scratch tool was not as good as when the designated plate was used, and some wounds could not be picked up by the scanning mode (Figure 8), thus unable to correctly define the initial wound area. Additionally, the scratch tool can be used to create scratch wounds, with analysis either manually, by image processing programs, or using other end-point visualization and analysis tools. They provide more flexibility to locate the initial wounds, and therefore are not limited to the designated plates. On the other hand, the migration/invasion assay combined with live-cell imaging in the current protocol is less time-consuming and less error-prone. This could be particularly useful for experimental consistency and increased efficiency.
In conclusion, this migration/invasion assay is quick, easy and robust. Users can choose from our protocol and others based on their need and budget.

Original Source:
https://www.jove.com/video/59042/a-simple-migrationinvasion-workflow-using-an-automated-live-cell


Category:
/health and fitness/disease/cancer


Top Keywords:
- Cell migration,
- homogeneous scratch wounds,
- layers of epithelial cells


Site:
jove.com